Military Embedded Systems

Company Directory

LDRA Technology

2540 King Arthur Blvd, Suite #228
Lewisville, TX 75056
[email protected]
https://ldra.com/
LDRA Technology
Articles related to LDRA Technology
Avionics

FACE 3.1 Enhancements. What Could Possibly Go Wrong? - Whitepaper

April 25, 2022
LDRA Technology   Lynx Software Technologies   Collins Aerospace  
Avionics

WEBCAST: Minimize compliance pain while navigating safety and cybersecurity certification of COTS and C++ solutions - News

January 15, 2021
John McHale - Editorial Director, Military Embedded Systems   LDRA Technology  

SCOTTDALE, Arizona. A new requirement for adherence to function safety or security standards can be a rude awakening for the uninitiated. There can be no half measures when applications are critical.  Requirements traceability, static analysis, dynamic coverage analysis, and unit/integration testing are deemed essential, not just at the end of development but throughout the development lifecycle. Such activities can come at a considerable overhead.  Off the shelf and open source software promise to offset that, and are in abundant supply for common system components such as RTOS and UI. However, integrating them within the application domain in a safety- or security-critical context can be a logistical nightmare for the unwary.  This webcast of industry experts will help you to pick your way through the demands of the functional safety and cybersecurity standards to minimize the pain of compliance while maximising the benefit of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software component use.

Avionics

FACE approach improves affordability, time-to-field of avionics systems and software platforms - Story

January 20, 2020
Ricardo Camacho - director of Safety & Security Compliance, Parasoft   LDRA Technology  
Avionics

FACE approach improves affordability, time-to-field of avionics systems and software platforms - Blog

June 19, 2019
Ricardo Camacho - director of Safety & Security Compliance, Parasoft   LDRA Technology  
Maintaining U.S. supremacy in all aspects of warfare can be challenging for Department of Defense (DoD) leaders, partly due to being locked into proprietary platforms or vendor- specific open architectures. These issues limit the government?s ability to bring in third parties to compete or add new capabilities, which has resulted in sole-source or single-bidder contract awards. An open systems architecture strategy has shown to curb the high-cost, long program schedules and lack of integration options of warfighting capabilities. This is where an initiative such as the Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE) can play a major role in making a business and technological difference.
Avionics

Vendor backing grows for the emerging FACE standard - Blog

April 30, 2019
Ricardo Camacho - director of Safety & Security Compliance, Parasoft   LDRA Technology  
Avionics vendors ? hardware and software ? share an enthusiasm for the Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE) Technical Standard, which promotes a common operating environment with reuse of software capabilities across multiple Department of Defense (DoD) avionics systems. This enthusiasm continues to grow as does participation within the FACE consortium ? run by the Open Group ? as the version 3.0 of the standard is soon to be released. The long -term life-cycle cost savings enabled by reuse standards such as FACE are changing the face of the DoD the procurement process for embedded computing solutions.
Avionics

Getting the requirements right in avionics safety certification, FACE compliance, and certifying UAVs - Story

February 28, 2017
John McHale - Editorial Director, Military Embedded Systems   LDRA Technology  
In this Q&A with Jim McElroy, Vice President of Sales and Marketing at LDRA, he discusses how poor requirements can doom avionics certification efforts, common mistakes engineers make in this process, Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE) compliance, and how certifying commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware to Design Assurance Level A for avionics safety certification. He also looks at how certifying unmanned aircraft to fly in civilian airspace may require a new mindset for everyone involved. Edited excerpts follow.
Cyber

Test and analysis tools help verify and enforce security in military systems - Story

September 15, 2016
Chris Tapp   Jay Thomas   LDRA Technology  
Secure coding practices, properly tested and verified, can help assure the reliable and safe operations of military systems. Organizations should start from the ground up, using a combination of static and dynamic analysis, unit and integration testing, and requirements traceability.
Avionics
Image via Kongsberg
News
Bell 412 helicopters to be upgraded for Norwegian Armed Forces by Kongsberg

September 04, 2024

More Avionics
Unmanned
MQ-9 Reaper image: U.S. Air Force courtesy photo
News
UAS market for military use to rise 13.8% to 2023, study predicts

September 05, 2024

More Unmanned
A.I.
Story
Ultra’s Chief Growth Officer Chris Bishop to keynote CJADC2 Virtual Summit Sept. 12

August 28, 2024

More A.I.
Comms
Image via Northrop Grumman
News
Integrated ground system for Space Development Agency to be developed by General Dynamics

September 05, 2024

More Comms